Public Notice – Clean County website to serve as a clearinghouse for information (Letter to the Editor)
Morehead City, N.C.
Oct. 7, 2011
To the Editor:
….
Clean County Coalition has developed a website that functions as a clearinghouse for information. We will post all pertinent public interest documents relating to projects in ourcounty that could affect the health and/or safety of the citizens and our environment.
….
Anyone wishing to post information about this or any other Carteret County project should feel free to contact us. We will review the documents and if we feel they are appropriate we will place them on our website. We may be reached at: cleancountycoalition@gmail.com.
….
Leigh Johnson
Clean County Coalition VP
The Summer of Sulfur Timeline
On January 7, 2011, the Eastern Carolina Council of Government (ECC) issued a letter to the town of MHC which contained an attached 3 page proposal describing, in detail, the PCS facility to be built at the MHC port. This letter included a complete project description on the sulfur melting plant. The ECC informed the town that they had until January 21 to comment on the proposal.
One week later, on January 14, 2011 Town Manager Randy Martin, Mayor Jones, City Planning Director Linda Staab, and Councilman George Ballou attended the Local Emergency Planning Committee meeting. Mayor Jones mentioned this meeting in his timeline (but failed to state that he was present at this meeting). There was discussion at this meeting of PCS’ plans to melt sulfur at the MHC port. Mayor Jones promised to, “Put the port facilities on our agenda for our next meeting to get an update.”
On May 20, 2011, Morehead City sent a letter to Brad Newland of the NC Division of Air Quality confirming that the PCS melting facility was a permitted use in the Industrial Port (IP) district. The letter mentions “melting solid sulfur to form liquid, then transferring liquid sulfur from the port to barges for transport to Aurora”. Morehead City Planning Director Linda Staab signed this letter.
In his timeline, Mayor Jones stated that on June 8, 2011, he and EDC Director Miles Stempin discussed the proposed sulfur melting facility which would receive incentives from the Dept. of Commerce. After this, a month passed with no public discussion, public hearing or public notification.
One month later, on July 8, 2011, the Carteret County New Times ran a front page story on the proposed PCS sulfur melting facility. Jet Matthews, owner of Morehead City Yacht Basin, had received a certified letter from PCS notifying him of the PCS CAMA permit application. This was the only permit notification required under state law. After digging, he found out the true scope of the project and went to the paper with the story.
On July 11, 2011, Mayor Richard Stanley of Beaufort signs a resolution opposing the Sulfur melting facility. Mayor Jones went on record opposing the facility on JULY 12.
On JULY 12, 2011, 122 citizens attended a Morehead City Council meeting to voice their anger, dismay, frustration, and shock over the facility and the lack of public notification. And as they say, the rest is history. Gov. Perdue made her announcement on Wed. July 27.
The ECC project description given to MHC, minutes from the Local services Planning Committee meeting, the MHC Zoning Determination Letter, and the Town of Beaufort resolution (documents referenced above) can all be seen in their original form using the links below.
Referenced Documents:
2011-01-07 Eastern Carolina Council – NC Intergovernmental Review Process Review and Comment Form
2011-01-14 Minutes – Carteret County Local Emergency Planning Committee
Press Release – PotashCorp Meeting with Clean County Coalition
MOREHEAD CITY – A delegation from Potash Corp. met with representatives of the Clean County Coalition on Wednesday, Aug. 31, to discuss the company’s intentions at the State Port here. The two-hour discussion covered a range of issues surrounding the company’s options for transshipping and storing dry sulfur as well as Carteret County’s interest in maintaining an environment conducive to its tourism-based economy.
Representing Potash Corp’s PCS Phosphate Aurora division were Steven A. Beckel, general manager, Michelle C. Vaught, manager of public affairs, George House, outside counsel for environmental affairs, and Jason T. Sanders, an environmental consultant.
The Coalition was represented by John Nelson, president, Leigh Johnson, vice president, and several steering committee members.
Acknowledging that the company had “misjudged the public reaction” to its earlier plan to build a sulfur re-melting plant at the port, Beckel and House offered a commitment to complete transparency around the company’s intentions from now on.
They said that, of various options for meeting the Aurora operation’s sulfur needs, they favored one that would entail importing formed solid sulfur to Morehead City, storing it in a new building adjoining the present A-frame warehouses on the north side of the Port, and reloading it on barges to a re-melting plant in Aurora. No expansion would take place at the company’s Radio Island terminal.
According to PCS, the enclosed storage would be a first in an industry that typically stores sulfur in open piles.
The company and the Coalition representatives tentatively agreed on the following points:
- PCS will underwrite the cost of hiring an independent environmental analyst to evaluate the company’s plans for sulfur operations at the Morehead port. The consultant is to be selected by the Coalition subject to the company’s concurrence;
- Some local residents will have the opportunity to inspect an existing sulfur facility at the company’s expense;
- All PCS plans involving the Morehead City Port will be well-publicized and transparent, including meetings with local and state officials and various interest groups.
The PCS presentation to the Clean County Coalition was preceded by a similar meeting with some local officials and other interested persons on Tuesday. That meeting was not publicized.
For further information, contact:
John Nelson, Coalition president
Leigh Johnson, vice-president
Speech to Morehead City Town Council – Leigh Johnson, VP of Clean County Coalition
My name is Leigh Johnson and I am Vice President of the Clean County Coalition. We thank the Mayor and Board for the opportunity to address you concerning the Town’s zoning and the proposed sulfur handling operation at the State Port.
First of all, I would like to say that we are very fond of the slogan which we see on the t-shirts in the audience tonight. We are one community and it IS all about having a healthy balance in our community which we can all enjoy. We couldn’t agree more. We also would like to make it crystal clear that we are not anti-port or anti- business. We live next to, go to church with, and are friends with the port employees living in our community. We are not out to shut the port down or see port employees lose their jobs. Conversely, we would like to see quality industries recruited and quality jobs added. We are NOT a bunch of left wing liberal, vegan, granola- eating, Birkenstock wearing tree-huggers. What we ARE is a group of concerned citizens who are interested in seeing that any business brought into our port ENHANCES, rather than detracts from, the land and water uses currently in existence in our county. We would like to see industry that adds revenue to our $258 million dollar/year tourist industry. We are business owners, nurses, doctors, lawyers, journalists, consultants, and real-estate agents, among other things.
Unlike other towns such as Charleston, Savannah, or Galveston whose ports are well-off the beaten tourist paths, our port in MHC is at the epicenter of our downtown area which is currently being revitalized. It is a stone’s throw, literally from marinas, restaurants, shops, condominiums, residential areas, churches and schools. This is a fundamental fact which CANNOT be ignored and should be the main factor considered when deciding on what projects to allow at the port. C3 was able to bring a lot of attention to the Port and PCS’s desire to forever change the appearance of our town with smokestacks and the addition of a chemical factory for importing and melting sulfur. PCS has reportedly withdrawn their plans for a melting operation. While we are happy about this, it was ALWAYS only one part of the reason for our opposition to the project.
REMINDER: Clean County Presentation at Morehead City Town Council Meeting
- The Morehead City Town Council meets at 5:30 p.m. this Tuesday (August 9) at the Municipal Chambers, 202 S. 8th St., Morehead City.
One of the agenda items is a presentation on dry sulfur by the Clean County Coalition. The group continues to oppose any plans by PCS Phosphate/PotashCorp to handle and process dry sulfur at the Port of Morehead City.
The citizens’ group recently sent a letter to the Town Council asking for a review of the zoning ordinance pertaining to the Port-Industrial District. The Coalition believes that storage of dry sulfur at the Port should not be a “permitted use.”
The group advocates amending the ordinance to remove any permitted use that “would offend the community by excessive noise, odor, smoke, dust, airborne debris or any other objectionable characteristic, which might be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of surrounding neighborhoods and the community.”
Jerry Eborn, Chair of The Morehead City Port Committee, said that his organization is planning to attend Tuesday’s Town Council meeting to show its “support for the Morehead City Port, the jobs it has created and the economic impact it has provided to our area. We have a few people who are going to speak. We may have some T-shirts, also,” Eborn said.
Tuesday, August 16 – MHC Planning Board
MHC Planning Board, Tuesday, August 16.
MHC C3 members will request zoning changes on port industrial locations and also request a moritorium on all future developments at the port until such time as new proposed zoning has been completed.
See attached letter to MHC and Press release. Again, public support for this initiative is important.
Tuesday, Aug. 9th at 5:30pm Morehead City Town Council Meeting – Clean County Coalition: Presentation on Dry Sulfur Pellets
MOREHEAD CITY TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
Clean County Coalition: Presentation on Dry Sulfur Pellets
Tuesday: August 9 – Regular Morehead City Town Board – Old police station (202 South 8th Street), 2nd floor 5:30pm
During PUBLIC COMMENT: C3 members from Morehead City will give 20 minute presentation on properties, hazards and explosive nature of dry sulfur pellets and dust.
Public is urged to attend to learn about dry sulfur and to support MHC residents in their efforts on proposed new zoning language.
Clean County Coalition’s Statement: Gov. Perdue’s Actions Regarding the MHC State Port
July 28, 2011
Gov. Perdue’s Actions Regarding the Morehead City State Port
The Clean County Coalition salutes Gov. Beverly Perdue for her decisive action in negotiating and end to PCS Phosphate plans to build a sulfur re-melting facility and dry sulfur storage at the state port. This was to be an industrial use of the port that was fundamentally in conflict with the coastal character Morehead City, Beaufort and surrounding areas.
The Coalition worked hard over the last two weeks to persuade Gov. Perdue and other state officials that the risks and environmental effects of sulfur processing and handling would do irreparable damage to this community and its tourism-based economy. The public response included massive citizen participation as well as unanimous resolutions of opposition from the towns of Beaufort, Morehead City, Atlantic Beach, Pine Knoll Shores, Emerald Isle and Cape Carteret, as well as the Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Council, Downtown Revitalization Committee, Crystal Coast Tourism Development Authority, Crystal Coast Hospitality Association, Carteret County Association of Realtors and the Carteret County Commissioners.
Gov. Perdue was quick to credit grassroots community action for persuading her to act. In the spirit of citizen participation, she has ordered a public review of appropriate activities at the state ports. The Clean County Coalition looks forward to playing a continuing role in this review.
Leigh Johnson and Renee Coles
Clean County Coalition
PO Box 958, Morehead City, 28557
252-241-2255
Email from Neal Littman, GM, Morehead City Yacht Basin
This letter from Neal Littman was also featured in The Compass News 360:
Sulfur plant hits bump
Posted Thursday, 7/21/2011
To All,
PCS thought this project was wired in advance with “key players”. PCS was good at making this project sound like an extension of their existing operations. It is NOT. It is a chemical processing facility new to North Carolina. It smells bad. There are serious health hazards. It is ugly and will have smokestacks towering twice the height of the high rise bridge. How is this good for Carteret County?
When they approached us (Morehead City Yacht Basin) several months ago it was to seek approval for extension of their barge berth on Calico Creek “to improve material handling capacity related to their phosphate business…” We tried to assist PCS in their expansion by discussing the channel limitations and the need to get input from the US Army due to their 175 foot vessels with greater beam than our pleasure boats. We met with the US Army officials, they got the US Army Corps of Engineers involved and we came to a mutual agreement as to the extent of the additional dredging that was needed. At no point during this phase of conversation did PCS mention that they really wanted to construct an industrial chemical facility immediately adjacent toMorehead City Yacht Basin. We found that out when we received on Friday, July 1st (the start of the July 4th weekend) a very cryptic notice regarding a PCS Phosphate application for modification of an existing CAMA permit. It was impossible to tell from the notice what the scope of the proposed project would be. I contacted the PCS Phosphate Senior Scientist to request a copy of the Environmental Assessment, as is our right. He emailed a copy to me. It was only then that I understood that PCS and the State Port were proposing a new industrial chemical factory. We had subsequent conversations with their Senior Scientist and the PCS Director of Environmental Compliance. Jet Matthews and I were on a conference call with the PCS officials and we learned that this process was new to PCS and new to the region and no, PCS had never operated any similar facility, but that they did have experience handling molten sulfur here at the State Port and at Aurora, NC.
Molten sulfur is a different form of sulfur than what they are proposing to process. PCS wants to purchase sulfur in its dry form and have it transported to the MC State Port in bulk cargo ships (much cheaper than buying the molten sulfur, which is commonly a by product of refining petroleum) and then convert it to its molten state. This “phase change” or change in the state of the element sulfur is what creates value for PCS. For PCS, the minimum net operating profit per ton for changing the form of sulfur from the dry state into the molten state is about $120 and may be as high as $600 per ton. Since they are building sulfur melters with a daily capacity of 5,000 tons, this gives them a potential net operating income of $600,000 per day on the low side and up to $3,000,000 per day one the upper end. This is before amortizing the cost of the chemical factory, but that can be done with a small part of the income stream generated by the sulfur chemical plant. Serious value is created by changing the state of the material. PCS will not easily give up that money. Just do a Google search for “cost of sulfur” and you will gain greater understanding about the economic incentives for PCS. They are considerable. What does Carteret County get? Nothing… Actually, worse than nothing. Bad smells, pollution, a considerable reduction in the tax base due to much lower property values.
Sulfur dust in its dry form is explosive. They will be moving it around the State Port on conveyor belts. At each “transfer point” PCS says it will provide dust control by wetting down the dry sulfur so that the dust does not build up and become explosive. Sulfur dust will be generated by every movement of the pelletized material throughout the State Port. The conveyor system cannot be made “air tight” as it has to allow for the venting of the hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide gases that are naturally formed when sulfur is in contact with oxygen. Great. Some of the sulfur smells escape to the atmosphere, no matter what they do. Some sulfuric acid is formed, no matter what they do. PCS has considerable experience with accidents causing explosions and fires from sulfur dust. Numerous examples exist at Aurora of fires caused by train wheel contact with rails that have a dusting of sulfur… The worst industrial accident in North Carolina in the last century was caused by dust at the West Pharmaceuticals factory in Kinston. Similarly, Georgia’s worst industrial accident was caused by dust in a sugar refining facility. A lot of dust will escape from the State Port. It is much finer than the dust from the wood chip operation at the State Port and we have to deal with that debris every day in Eastern Morehead City. It is a danger. How does the State Port plan to prevent explosive dust from detonating the PETN explosives that the State Port periodically has present… and has spilled? How can the State Portsegregate the fire hazards of the chemical factory and the wood chip operation? Does anybody at the State Port have a clue about protecting the neighbors and the larger community? We see no evidence of that in practice on a daily basis.
Air quality is addressed by trying to get this project in place before the US EPA implementation of much more restrictive sulfur rules (which become effective on 1/1/2013) and by gaming how the airborne pollutants are measured. To achieve the even the lower standards now required, PCS design engineers measure the air concentration of pollutants at ground level at the fence line or boundary of the property and they discharge the airborne pollutants from the top of a smokestack that is 150 feet high! The Morehead City-Beaufort High Rise Bridge is only about 75 feet high! The PCS workers will all have to wear an electronic sniffer or chemical sensor that sounds an alarm if it detects the presence of hydrogen sulfide gas (which can very quickly kill a worker). We have people sleeping on boats less than 150 feet from the boundary of the proposed industrial chemical factory. They don’t have sniffers. In the PCS plan, no one outside the boundary of the property counts. Tough. You had your chance to object. One of the more ludicrous aspects of the “scrubber and air filtration equipment to reduce air pollution is that the design standards call for meeting the discharge criteria for reducing harmful discharges beginning three hours after the start up of the chemical factory and end three hours before the factory shutdown. If the system is started and stopped once each day it means that for six hours of the operation PCS can legally exceed the permit discharge limits. The same air quality official who approved the PCS air quality permit for NC DENR told us that the State Port has in operation a very effective dust supression system for the wood chip operation, including sparyers, containment and more. We looked out the window and let him know that it was not operating today, yesterday, last week or last month and that he should come look at it. He mumbled something about not having travel money. We perhaps could relocate his desk to the boundary of the State Port property… Remember, you can smell this PCS sulfur in concentrations about 1/20th of the maximum allowable concentration they now have under the terms of the air quality permit already granted.
“This project is a great economic boon for the area and PCS is going to spend $80 million, no $85 million no, $90 million on this project.” The facts are:
(a) that the vast majority of that money flows to suppliers of specialty items and contractors from far outside Carteret County;
(b) that PCS does not pay any taxes at all to Morehead City or Carteret County (never has and will not in the future). You see, the State Port just leases the property to PCS and PCS pays “fees” to the State Port and as a State Agency the State Port pays no taxes. Local governments just have to provide emergency services, water and sewer and the rest of the taxpayers absorb the cost; and
(c) very few additional employees are needed to operate the facility. Our one business will lose more employees and contractors and vendors than PCS will be hiring due to people relocating their boats to more pleasant communities. It is easy to untie the docklines and sail away. What about all of the other businesses in the community?
(d) If this industrial chemical project is finally approved, property values in the community will plummet and vibrant downtown business will be a thing of the past. Even if the value of the PCS project was $200 million and they were going to spend half of it here in Carteret County, it would be a small fraction of the cumulative damage to the value of property in our communities. It adds nothing to and instead will take away a great deal of money from the tax base. We have already begun seeing people put their plans on hold! Please tell us how this particular “economic development project” is in any way a good thing for Carteret County!
The important elements of this proposed project are:
1. There would be significant discharges to the air of sulfur dust, the gaseous forms of sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and lesser discharges of other toxic and non toxic gases. Significant quantities of sufuric acid are produced in this planned industrial chemical plant which will end up in the waters of our area after being airborne and causing significant increased corrosion rates, injury to flora and fauna as well as terribly complicating respiratory problems in humans.
2. The quantities of gases that PCS says they will discharge is interpreted by humans as a very nasty smell. It really is the smell of rotten eggs and worse. Noxious smells have the worst possible effect on tourism, property values and quality of life. No other factor even comes close in industrial communities.
3. There is a considerable net loss of jobs, not a net gain due to the harmful effects of the chemical factory. PCS has never before done this chemical process and cannot cite a single similar facility where this same method is used. They claim it is safe though. They have had accidents before and no mechanical system works all of the time. The last major PCS accident at the State Port was when their ship crashed into the railroad bridge in theMorehead City turning basin. The railroad bridge was out of commission for many weeks. The probabilities of an accident are quite high given the dangers involved. PCS has exactly zero experience operating this type of facility!
4. Our area depends on good water and air quality. We will lose that. For what? This PCS chemical factory is not economic development, it is an economic and ecological disaster for Carteret County.
When was the last time Beaufort and Morehead City had unanimous votes about anything? They have about this very stinky project. It is smelly, both literally and figuratively and is very close to final approval!
We have to keep trying to get people to read and understand what PCS itself has to say about its own design in the plans and environmental assessment.
Again, please let me know why this is a good idea!
Thanks,
neal
Neal Littman, General Manager
Morehead City Yacht Basin
252-659-2615 cell
252-726-6862 ofc





